Part I. “Emotions and Critical Pedagogy” by Jaye
Theil (from Jones chapter 3)
This was a dull read for me. The editor’s introduction reads
“Jaye has chosen to focus on the need to listen to and share emotional
experiences in our classroom rather than the specifics of the student’s story
itself.” (p. 36) I found the vagueness surrounding the student’s story
frustrating. In a podcast from Malcolm
Gladwell about why country music makes us cry (“The King of Tears” Season 2,
Episode 6, Revisionist History) he
concluded that it was country music lyrics’ minute details and specificity that
inspired tears and empathy. There was no detail here, and I admit I was
disappointed and unengaged.
I did underline a few things. “Our relationships must be
built on something more embodied than performance standards and curriculum
goals, both of which are imposed on our lives rather than born out of our
experience.” (pp. 41-42) “By naming our feelings and allowing emotion to embody
us in the classroom space, willing to permit emotional testimony and witnessing
… we are able to work toward student dignity as the cornerstone of our
relationships.” (p. 45) So classrooms relationships are enhanced by emotional
sharing or stifled by emotional resistance.
But there were some lines that didn’t make sense to me. “When things don’t go as planned, when
students cry, or yell, or share too deeply, the blame is placed on ‘otherness’—class, race, gender …” (p. 40)
Really? Have any of my classmates
witnessed or experienced this? It seems
an extraordinary claim to make. I suppose gender stereotypes have been used to
explain a boy’s outburst or a girl’s tears.
But when is class and race used as a reason for unwanted emotional
expression? The other statement I felt come out of the blue was a quote from
Megan Boler (1999): “Emotions are a primary medium through which we learn to
internalize ideologies as commonsense truths.”
She specifically cites that shame and humiliation are used to teach
rules about anger and authority. Boler
is also referenced to make the claim that the rules of what is acceptable
differ by gender, race, or social standing.
(p. 40) These statements seem
broad and I wish there had been some concrete examples.
Part II. “Las Fronteras …” by Daphne Hall (from Jones
chapter 4)
Crossing borders is the theme of this essay by Daphne Hall,
but only in the minutest way does it refer to the physical borders of Mexico
and the United States. The borders that
Hall speaks of are the borders of class, culture, economy, and language in the
relationship between the teacher and the families of their students. To build relationship with students and their
families, Hall advocates teachers cross the boundaries between them and go into the homes and worlds of the
families. When we expect the families to come to the schools and the
teachers’ turf we are “requiring families to do the bulk of the boundary
crossing” (p. 50) and to remain in the position of vulnerability with less
powerful status. I have invited adult
students and their families to my home, to my annual birthday party, and to
lunch. I have been repeatedly invited to
the home of a student, Atefeh, and I have enjoyed getting to know her and her
family better. I can help with her
children’s school paperwork, making family medical appointments, provide
transportation for shopping and more.
They feed me excessively and drown me in the best green tea I have ever had,
and my friend begs me to come often. My
husband worries that I might get taken advantage of and he has also expressed
concern when I paid a student, who was looking for odd jobs, to help with yard
work. Did I take advantage of him? Should I consider if the blurring of the
teacher/student or teacher/family lines into more friendly relationships can
cause confusion, be manipulative, or result in a loss of effectiveness as a
teacher? So far, I have not seen
evidence of such. I will continue to try
to befriend any student who shows interest and I will continue to try to be useful
to my student/friends.
Hall also advocates
that teachers learn the language of the student’s family. She writes, “Placing myself in the role of
learner was probably the ultimate equalizer when there were such disparities in
status and power.” (pp. 67-68) I have found that with my adult students, they
LOVE to have the roles reversed or stabilized by having the opportunity to help
me or teach me some of their languages.
When students see me using dictionaries in Arabic or Somali or when I
use a little Spanish and ask for help with vocabulary or a different written script,
they light up with enthusiasm and pride.
I don’t have to be anything more than a beginner in their languages for
them to revel in being the teacher and the one with a superior
proficiency. Since loving foreign
languages is half of what led me to this career, this is a strategy that I can
embrace. It comes natural to me to want
to learn language from my student while they learn mine.
Part
III. My research questions
Students at Dorcas often ask for one-on-one tutoring. Most are intermediate level students looking
for opportunities to practice conversation.
In the class room they may get asked 5 or 6 questions to answer out
loud. This is not enough practice to
continue progressing without some supplementary time spent outside the class
time speaking English.
One of my
tutoring students is Sylvia. She has
been in ESL level 4 for a couple of years.
It is high intermediate level.
But she is frustrated because she seems to be stalled. Her progress at first was quick but now she
has seemed to plateau in her language learning.
She does not get to speak English at home and does not work outside the
home, so her English is only used at English class. It is not enough practice. How can I help her progress beyond this
language learning plateau, particularly an absence of immersion opportunities?
This is a common experience among second/additional language
learners at an intermediate level.
Progress is quick at first and then it slows down. I want to research what strategies are useful
when the language learning plateau happens.
My topic question is:
What are effective strategies for assisting students to accelerate or
continue their progress towards proficiency after they have plateaued in their
language learning?
My assumptions
about language learning plateau strategies are:
1.
Immersion is ideally the best approach to a
language learning plateau.
2.
Grammar instruction should continue along with
increased conversation practice.
3.
Balancing reading, writing, speaking, and
listening practice is important.
My sub-questions are directly related to my assumptions.
1.
What opportunities exist for immersion into the
second/additional language for my student?
2.
How much grammar instruction is effective for
getting beyond the language learning plateau?
3.
How much conversation practice is effective for
getting beyond the language learning plateau?
4.
What balance between reading, writing, speaking,
and listening is best for getting beyond the language learning plateau?
5.
What methods should the student adopt to
continue their language learning progress?
6.
What goals, motivation, and commitment are
required by the student to advance beyond the language learning plateau?
If I can find out the answer to my questions about language
learning plateau strategies, I can be more effective guiding and teaching the adult
students of Dorcas International Institute of RI.
'“When things don’t go as planned, when students cry, or yell, or share too deeply, the blame is placed on ‘otherness’—class, race, gender …” (p. 40) Really? Have any of my classmates witnessed or experienced this? It seems an extraordinary claim to make."
ReplyDeleteI just wanted to respond to this because I have seen this, rather frequently from colleagues and have been guilty of it myself. It becomes a trap that you fall in in your teaching experience, and it is difficult to avoid. It is much easier now that I am aware of my weaknesses.
Your overarching question is excellent, Deborah. I also like that you listed your assumptions, because that's key to how you are framing your questions.
ReplyDeleteDo you want this to be a general overall topic, or focus specifically on Sylvia as a case study? If the latter, it might be a little tricky.
Dr. Johnson,
ReplyDeleteI am thinking that I would like to interview several students including Silvia, about their experiences and perceptions about their language learning to progress. I mentioned Silvia as background or context for my interest in the topic of language learning plateaus.